Skip to main content

Move over, Hester: Speaker Mikey's in town...

Remember Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Puritan society in his novel, The Scarlet Letter?  Poor Hester Prynne violated the laws of the church, which meant that she broke society’s laws, too.  At the beginning of the novel, the reader joins Hester as she leaves the safety of the town prison and makes her way back into the society that jailed her.  Reading the book for the first time in the 11th grade, I had a hard time understanding how, in a free society, the religion of one group could also form its judicial system.  That makes the laws of God the same thing as the laws of man.   Separation of church and state was also an 11th grade U.S. history lesson, so we students figured no more Hesters could be jailed for breaking the laws of her religion .  Or so we thought.  We fought a war 250 years ago to separate the colonies from a king who was not only ruler of the government but leader of the church.  A quick walk through British history shows what a mess that ideal leads to:  remember Henry VIII

Jane’s Oppression - Part 3


Please read Jane's Dilemma - Part 1 and Jane’s Obstacles - Part 2 first.

Abortions have been around as long as sex. Potions, herbs, magic, old wives tales, and quacks have provided the service to women for thousands of years, because desperate women turn to desperate measures.

Problem was, many of these abortions were often unsafe, ineffective, and in some cases, deadly.

Roe V. Wade changed that in the 70’s. By giving women the right to choose whether to carry a fetus to term, a host of other medical rights followed. It wasn’t simply legal abortion that gave women choices about their lives; it was also better health care that included prenatal, post miscarriage, and post-natal care. In addition, Roe ensured that a pregnancy gone wrong could be dealt with on a clinical level, without stigma or judgment. The decision opened doors to reproductive counseling and birth control accessibility, empowering women to control their futures, much like men had always been able to do.

Sure, over the past 50 years there were signs that Roe hadn’t quieted the shouts and cries of the Right; only those not paying attention thought the fight was over. Red states whittled away at the weeks a woman could legally obtain an abortion, as well as the number of places to get one. Those states often included intrusive mandatory counseling that demonized the abortion procedure. Religious leaders proselytized from the pulpits about the hellish activities of baby killers. And in 2017, an electoral college put a man in office who had run on the promise of appointing only anti-abortion judges to the bench, including the Supreme Court.

Then June 24, 2022 happened, and women’s rights began falling like a house of cards. Even women who advocated for unborn fetuses found out that they, too, could be a casualty of Dobbs, as women across the country lost access to birth control, necessary D&C’s after miscarriages, and reproductive counseling at health departments.  In a blink of an eye, women lost the right to determine their own health and control their own futures. In many states, women can no longer decide when or with whom to start a family or whether or not they can emotionally carry to term a fetus with no chance of survival. An ectopic pregnancy can be a death sentence in a red state, as politicians and the courts, rather than doctors, decide whether or not an abortion procedure is allowed.

Statistically, most women who get an abortion are already mothers. They choose to end an unplanned pregnancy for many reasons: expense of another child on a limited budget, interruption to career path, no desire to parent with the father. Ironically, the same politicians who thump their chests and proclaim themselves saviors of the unborn seem disinterested in the born children their policies create. Children are expensive, but the party that runs against abortion also runs against food stamps, health care, low-income housing, or father involvement, all of which might make an unexpected pregnancy a possibility rather than a curse.

Without the right to make decisions about reproductive care, women struggle in a world favorable to men who will never know the intrusion to body, soul, and career that an unwanted pregnancy brings. Without the right to health care that followed the Roe decision, women will continue the struggle to make medical decisions about their bodies, but they’ll stay under the thumb of rabid legislators who proclaim to love a fetus while enslaving its mother.

Unfortunately for our girl Jane, she is still twirling the Doctor’s card between trembling fingers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jane’s Dilemma - Part 1

Our girl Jane just finished a four-year degree program, graduating with honors in front of beaming parents who proudly watched their only daughter receive her diploma.  Unfortunately, the day after graduation, Jane discovered that all of her fears were right and she was, indeed, pregnant. Her boyfriend of the past several months had accepted a job on the other side of the country. He shouted promises that they’d stay in touch over his shoulder as he ran to catch his flight. Jane was pretty sure they wouldn’t, just like she was pretty sure her parents wouldn’t continue beaming if she told them the news. Jane looked at the three letters of interest from companies she longed to work for, lined in a row on her desk. They had made her jubilant about her future just a week ago, before she began to suspect the truth. She wondered how much interest any of these potential employers would garner if she arrived, breathless with enthusiasm and obviously pregnant. Jane twirled a wrinkled, white car

Move over, Hester: Speaker Mikey's in town...

Remember Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Puritan society in his novel, The Scarlet Letter?  Poor Hester Prynne violated the laws of the church, which meant that she broke society’s laws, too.  At the beginning of the novel, the reader joins Hester as she leaves the safety of the town prison and makes her way back into the society that jailed her.  Reading the book for the first time in the 11th grade, I had a hard time understanding how, in a free society, the religion of one group could also form its judicial system.  That makes the laws of God the same thing as the laws of man.   Separation of church and state was also an 11th grade U.S. history lesson, so we students figured no more Hesters could be jailed for breaking the laws of her religion .  Or so we thought.  We fought a war 250 years ago to separate the colonies from a king who was not only ruler of the government but leader of the church.  A quick walk through British history shows what a mess that ideal leads to:  remember Henry VIII

O this learning, what a thing it is!

Florida schools have now decreed that nothing from Shakespeare can be taught, if it’s sexual in nature.   I’ve got news for you, Ronnie.  All of Shakespeare is sexual in nature.  In fact, pretty much all of life is, too.  Think of Verona, Italy - the setting of Romeo and Juliet - as a microcosm of Florida.  Adults make all the bad decisions:  two groups live to fight each other, the prince decrees death to those who don’t follow his rigid laws, a priest gives bad advice to teens.  Romeo and Juliet are simply trying to survive and grow up in this not-very-conducive environment.  Kind of like teenagers in your state.  The good news for you, Ronnie, is that Romeo and Juliet get married before sex.  But sex it is, and without teaching that part of the play, the rest makes little sense.  And if students are lucky enough to have a Shakespeare-loving teacher who attempts to teach the comedies, high school students might run into A Midsummer Night’s Dream.  Fairy dust and lust is probably bann