Skip to main content

Move over, Hester: Speaker Mikey's in town...

Remember Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Puritan society in his novel, The Scarlet Letter?  Poor Hester Prynne violated the laws of the church, which meant that she broke society’s laws, too.  At the beginning of the novel, the reader joins Hester as she leaves the safety of the town prison and makes her way back into the society that jailed her.  Reading the book for the first time in the 11th grade, I had a hard time understanding how, in a free society, the religion of one group could also form its judicial system.  That makes the laws of God the same thing as the laws of man.   Separation of church and state was also an 11th grade U.S. history lesson, so we students figured no more Hesters could be jailed for breaking the laws of her religion .  Or so we thought.  We fought a war 250 years ago to separate the colonies from a king who was not only ruler of the government but leader of the church.  A quick walk through British history shows what a mess that ideal leads to:  remember Henry VIII

Oliver Twist 2023 - Part 1

 If you had a high school English teacher who was a 19th century British literary fanatic like I was, then you probably struggled with Charles Dickens and his classics a time or two.  That means you remember a few of his best characters, like Pip and Oliver Twist, and you might even know that Dickens used many of his own  life experiences to shape his novels.  

For example, Dickens’ father was taken to debtor’s prison, so young Charles had to provide income to his family by working in a blacking factory and other jobs that gave him particular insight into the horrors of child working conditions in the 19th century.  If you’ve read Dickens, you’ve read about those conditions.

But what you might not know is that those same horrors existed in this country, fueled by the Industrial Revolution and greed.  Nineteenth century American industry used hungry children in manufacturing jobs because they were cheap and small, giving them access to dangerous jobs like cleaning machines and going where no adult could. 

Puritan ideals that stressed work over idleness contributed to child labor in farming and agriculture, and throughout the first half of the 19th century, children aged 10-14 became indentured servants to learn a trade.  Throughout the century, immigrant children added to the labor force, especially European immigrants working in agriculture. 

By 1900, 18% of workers in this country - or 1.75 million children - were 16 or younger.

Mid 19th century reformers worked to convince the public that a primary education would lead to a better country.  Minimum wage and mandatory attendance at school were also floated as a way to ease child labor.  In 1902, The National Child Labor committee was at the forefront of social change.  Through photos, pamphlets, mass mailings and lobbying, they tried to change the laws governing working children.  Even though Congress passed federal child labor laws limiting the number of hours children could work, southern states resisted change.  In a 1918 Supreme Court decision, these new labor regulations were deemed unconstitutional and a violation of existing commerce law. 

Reformers sought and got a child labor constitutional amendment, passed by reformers in 1924, but it was blocked due to resistance by churches, farmers,  and conservative politicians.  The rallying cry was that federal government should not have power over children. 

The New Deal did much to improve child labor laws, giving federal government power over the workplace.  Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 set minimum wage, maximum working hours, and removed children from mining and manufacturing jobs, 

The rise of automation as well as the increase in the number of years that students needed to be in schools decreased the number of children in the workplace. In 1949, congress increased the child labor law bans to include  employment in communication, transportation and public utilities. 

Today, a legal child labor force still exists in the farming industry, with children under 12 exposed to dangerous machinery and pesticides with no mandatory regulation.  

In most cases, state laws still regulate child labor, which is why this is becoming relevant again.  Armed with a lack of farming regulations, a hatred of anything federal, and a need to bolster the workforce, states are changing the laws to look more 19th century than 21st.  

Stay tuned to see what the right has in mind, as they continue to cater to the rich - this time at the expense of our nation’s children.

... To be continued ...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jane’s Dilemma - Part 1

Our girl Jane just finished a four-year degree program, graduating with honors in front of beaming parents who proudly watched their only daughter receive her diploma.  Unfortunately, the day after graduation, Jane discovered that all of her fears were right and she was, indeed, pregnant. Her boyfriend of the past several months had accepted a job on the other side of the country. He shouted promises that they’d stay in touch over his shoulder as he ran to catch his flight. Jane was pretty sure they wouldn’t, just like she was pretty sure her parents wouldn’t continue beaming if she told them the news. Jane looked at the three letters of interest from companies she longed to work for, lined in a row on her desk. They had made her jubilant about her future just a week ago, before she began to suspect the truth. She wondered how much interest any of these potential employers would garner if she arrived, breathless with enthusiasm and obviously pregnant. Jane twirled a wrinkled, white car

Move over, Hester: Speaker Mikey's in town...

Remember Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Puritan society in his novel, The Scarlet Letter?  Poor Hester Prynne violated the laws of the church, which meant that she broke society’s laws, too.  At the beginning of the novel, the reader joins Hester as she leaves the safety of the town prison and makes her way back into the society that jailed her.  Reading the book for the first time in the 11th grade, I had a hard time understanding how, in a free society, the religion of one group could also form its judicial system.  That makes the laws of God the same thing as the laws of man.   Separation of church and state was also an 11th grade U.S. history lesson, so we students figured no more Hesters could be jailed for breaking the laws of her religion .  Or so we thought.  We fought a war 250 years ago to separate the colonies from a king who was not only ruler of the government but leader of the church.  A quick walk through British history shows what a mess that ideal leads to:  remember Henry VIII

O this learning, what a thing it is!

Florida schools have now decreed that nothing from Shakespeare can be taught, if it’s sexual in nature.   I’ve got news for you, Ronnie.  All of Shakespeare is sexual in nature.  In fact, pretty much all of life is, too.  Think of Verona, Italy - the setting of Romeo and Juliet - as a microcosm of Florida.  Adults make all the bad decisions:  two groups live to fight each other, the prince decrees death to those who don’t follow his rigid laws, a priest gives bad advice to teens.  Romeo and Juliet are simply trying to survive and grow up in this not-very-conducive environment.  Kind of like teenagers in your state.  The good news for you, Ronnie, is that Romeo and Juliet get married before sex.  But sex it is, and without teaching that part of the play, the rest makes little sense.  And if students are lucky enough to have a Shakespeare-loving teacher who attempts to teach the comedies, high school students might run into A Midsummer Night’s Dream.  Fairy dust and lust is probably bann