Skip to main content

Move over, Hester: Speaker Mikey's in town...

Remember Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Puritan society in his novel, The Scarlet Letter?  Poor Hester Prynne violated the laws of the church, which meant that she broke society’s laws, too.  At the beginning of the novel, the reader joins Hester as she leaves the safety of the town prison and makes her way back into the society that jailed her.  Reading the book for the first time in the 11th grade, I had a hard time understanding how, in a free society, the religion of one group could also form its judicial system.  That makes the laws of God the same thing as the laws of man.   Separation of church and state was also an 11th grade U.S. history lesson, so we students figured no more Hesters could be jailed for breaking the laws of her religion .  Or so we thought.  We fought a war 250 years ago to separate the colonies from a king who was not only ruler of the government but leader of the church.  A quick walk through British history shows what a me...
Post a Comment

Jane’s Obstacles - Part 2


Please read Jane's Dilemma - Part 1 first

 If you’re old enough to remember the early 70’s, you probably remember bell bottoms, the Bee Gees, and someone who had to get married because she was pregnant. One of my best friends was the smartest person in my class. At the end of our senior year, she was a wife, a mother, and a high school graduate. What she wasn’t was heading to college, like the rest of our group, to pursue a degree, a career, and a world that was beginning to open up with choices for women.

Roe happened a little too late for her and countless others who found themselves in the same position, with a choice between a hurried marriage (which didn’t work out in this case) or a back alley abortion. After 1973, the decision brought choice to those who might have made a mistake in the back of their boyfriend’s chevy and relegated themselves to a youth filled with diapers, Gerber, and dwindling chances for a career.

The Roe decision not only gave women autonomy over choice, but instigated other reproductive breakthroughs. The 70’s saw a rise in birth control pill use, as innovations and improvements made it a popular choice for women. Planned Parenthood was not only a protector of abortion rights, but one of the best disseminators of women’s health information about reproduction and birth control, counseling countless women about methods available on the market.

Not everyone was able to benefit from the growing health care market for women.  Abortions weren’t cheap, and legislators made sure that those on Medicaid weren’t eligible to use their insurance for an abortion.  So  those who could least afford another mouth to feed were most likely to have one. One’s address also dictated how long a woman had to decide whether to abort a pregnancy, as those that protested the idea of any abortion rights kept picking at the scab of time for women in Republican dominated states.

In fact, on April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court upheld the first case that sought to criminalize abortion, making partial birth abortions illegal and narrowing women’s reproductive rights. And women’s rights continue to narrow, completely disappearing in some states after the Dobbs decision in 2022.

“We’re Never Going Back” is a slogan that means something to those who lived when abortions were illegal. It would mean something to our girl, Jane. It should be the rallying cry for all women in this country, as so much is at stake. God forbid that my granddaughter faces the same  reproductive restrictions when she becomes an adult in 2038 as I did in 1973.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Show me your budget and I'll tell you what you value."

Joe Biden likes to quote his father.  Yesterday at the Philadelphia event to unveil his 2024 budget, he did it again. "Show me your budget and I'll tell you what you value" his father used to say.   Yesterday, I detailed some things in his budget here . Let's look at a few more items. Strengthens the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program -  Allows Health and Human Services (HHS) to negotiate additional rebates back to Medicaid programs from drug companies and improves purchasing power of the states and Medicaid programs.  Background - Passed in 1990, the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP) allows the government to negotiate and lower drug prices.  More on the MDRP at KFF . Who is helped by this budget item - the state Medicaid programs, low income people on Medicaid, pregnant and postpartum women, children on various Medicaid like programs.  Drugs on a typical Medicaid formulary are incredibly inexpensive and frequently free.  This helps Medicaid patients,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Oliver Twist 2023 - Part 1

 If you had a high school English teacher who was a 19th century British literary fanatic like I was, then you probably struggled with Charles Dickens and his classics a time or two.  That means you remember a few of his best characters, like Pip and Oliver Twist, and you might even know that Dickens used many of his own  life experiences to shape his novels.   For example, Dickens’ father was taken to debtor’s prison, so young Charles had to provide income to his family by working in a blacking factory and other jobs that gave him particular insight into the horrors of child working conditions in the 19th century.  If you’ve read Dickens, you’ve read about those conditions. But what you might not know is that those same horrors existed in this country, fueled by the Industrial Revolution and greed.  Nineteenth century American industry used hungry children in manufacturing jobs because they were cheap and small, giving them access to dangerous jobs li...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on “Common Sense” Education in Virginia

Governor Glenn Youngkin, in interviews and presentations, often refers to his policies as just “common sense.” For example, “common sense” is the typical description he provides for his views on public education in Virginia, a topic that played an important role in his winning the 2022 election. Imagining myself to be a sensible individual, and having spent much of my adult life as a (public) university professor of ancient history, I happen to care a great deal about real, life-long, and life-changing education, and I do not believe that Youngkin’s policies deliver genuine goods. Youngkin’s Executive Order Number 1 (2022) was entitled: Ending the Use of Inherently Divisive Concepts (my italics) Including Critical Race Theory, and Restoring Excellence in K-12 Education in the Commonwealth. The words “inherently divisive concepts” occur numerous times in the Order, which promises “professional development and training so teachers and schools are prepared to engage students on impor...
Post a Comment
Read more